Friday, April 27, 2012

Musicals, Musicals, Musicals


Playwrights Foundation is excited about Dominic Orlando's upcoming classes!  On April 29th, Dominic is holding his "Everybody's Writing A Musical, Why Shouldn't You?" class! It's your LAST chance to sign up!  Only FIVE spots remain!!



To get an idea about the musical theater industry, Playwrights Foundation asked Dominic how he feels musicals are different from general theatre.  Here's what he had to say:

 "It’s very difficult for a smartass like myself not to say, “music-theater is the one with the songs in it”, but in a way, that is the answer to part one of [your] question.  Everyone loves to sound smart, so you’ll hear people say “the songs should advance the action”, but if you look at classic music-theatre, that’s often not the case.  It’s more precise to say if you find yourself writing a monologue or an intense exchange between the characters you should stop writing and ask yourself, Is this a moment to be musicalized?  Transforming drama/character into a musical moment that actually works can be a real challenge, and I’ll go out on a limb and say it’s more difficult because from the beginning you’re working with a partner—either the composer, if it’s a team, or the music itself if you’re working alone. Music can do a lot of the work—but that means the lyrics have to take the music into account, often before the music is written.  A non-musical piece has to leave room for the actor, a musical piece has to leave room both for the performer and the music.  It’s tricky."

"Everybody's Writing A Musical, Why Shouldn't You?"
Sunday April 29th, 2012
Playwrights Foundation-1616 16th Street SF, CA
5:00-8:00pm

For more information about Dominic's classes, please visit: http://www.playwrightsfoundation.org/index.php?p=257

And, as always, please check out Playwrights Foundation for upcoming events, readings, and classes at: http://playwrightsfoundation.org/

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

An Interview with Bekah Brunstetter!


We're going back-to-back! Our April Rough Readings Series continues with Bekah Brunstetter's House of Home!  It will be read on April 23rd at Stanford and April 24th at Thick House in San Francisco.



People start writing at different stages of their lives.  How did your career as a playwright begin?

I've written stories and poems since I was a kid, starting doing theater in high school to make some friends, was an actor (BADLY) then wrote my first play freshman year of college. I was instantly hooked - it was something that felt like it was mine, while simultaneously connecting me with other people. I continued to write plays all through college. I had no idea what I was doing, but was able to see these plays produced. Next up, grad school for play-writing, then life, and here we are!

House of Home is based on a true-story, is it more or less difficult to depict a true-story without over or under-exaggerating specific events?  Or how do you go about not offending the people that were actually a part of the true-story?

I think it's important (unless you are creating a Laramie Project-esque piece) to fictionalize the event and characters that are serving as your source material. A.) Because usually, you don't know every in and out of the story, and you don't want to pretend to know - so it's important to make it yours. Creating a new narrative basedon the actual event allows you to actually be a dramatist with the story. Otherwise, when receiving notes, you end up with this defense mechanism of 'well, that's not what really happened' which oftentimes isn't helpful for the play's development. As for the Maxwell family - I can't pretend to fully understand them as human beings, or understand what happened to them. But I was so gripped by what happened to them - they felt so familiar to me, as humans, that  I had to write a play about it. To do so, I had to invent, as opposed to fully recreate. 

There is an abundance of topics to write about out there, and I would think that would make it difficult to hone in on one topic.  If you could narrow your favorite writing topics down to three, what would they be and why?

I always come back to religion, love/relationships and the military families. Religion and faith because it is something that always has and always will intrigue and confuse me, in the best way. I was raised in a very Christian household, and even as I move far into adulthood, it's still something that I'm trying to figure out for myself. I'm constantly worried that I'm not making the right decision in my terms of my faith, and I always come back to writing about things that I'm afraid of. Love / relationships because of unrequited needs from middle school. Military families because of my brothers serving in the Marine Corps - and what I perceive to be a lack of plays dealing with those in the service, and their family members, that aren't about politics or post-traumatic.

Let's end with inspiration! What single piece of advice would you give an aspiring playwright?

It's important to write, and write a lot. It won't matter what awards or productions or fellowships you might get if you're not writing constantly. The more you write, the more you'll find and hone your voice. Not just write constantly, but submit constantly! The more you put your work out there, the more it works for itself. It's incredible what can happen because of a tiny ten minute in a tiny theater - if the writing is truthful, and you - people will respond to it, and it will beget more opportunities for you. 

To obtain more information about Bekah's Rough Reading, please visit: http://playwrightsfoundation.org/index.php?p=53

Want to delve deeper into Bekah's mind?  Visit her blog at: http://blog.bekahbrunstetter.com/

Monday, April 9, 2012

The Days Before The Final Days with Keith Josef Adkins



We are kicking off April's Rough Readings Series with Keith Josef Adkins and his play, The Final Days of Negro-Ville!




His play will be read on April 16th at Stanford's CERAS Hall, as well as on April 17th at Thick House in San Francisco!  Playwrights Foundation recently interviewed Keith about the process of writing his newest piece!

Let's start with the basics! How long have you been writing plays, and what inspires you to do so?

I've been writing plays since the late 90s. However, I have been shaping characters from my imagination and personal observations for as long as I can remember.  Sometimes I think I actually channel the voices and experiences of my ancestors that are trapped in my DNA. (And I'm serious). In fact, before I became a teenager and easily embarrassed by vulnerability, my cousins would sit me in front of tape recorder and record my impersonations of character.  I am inspired by many things.  I am inspired by great literature, kick-butt music and courageous cinema and theater. I'm also inspired by my own spiritual and personal evolution.  I am someone who admits to loving the truth, but also admits it's hard to face and tell.  The more I face the truth of my life and how I live it and all the components that have help shape it, the more inspired I am to give testament to my journey as a human being.  Oh, I am very very inspired by laughter.
Down to the nitty-gritty, how did the story line for The Final Days of Negro-Ville come about?

I was born and raised in suburban Cincinnati. Both sides of my family have historical and/or present-day middle-class experiences.  Recently, many of my relatives have been hit hard by the recent economic crisis in our country.  Foreclosed homes, lost jobs, dismantled marriages. It's been a difficult thing to watch, however, I've been wanting to write something about it.  A few years ago I saw an amazing production of Our Time with Michael Shannon at the Barrow Street Theater in NYC. I walked away from that production with a fricking awesome idea:  blend a little of Our Town with my interest in black middle class suburbia.  Less than a month later, Valerie Curtis-Newton of The Hansberry Project in Seattle called me and said they wanted to commission someone to write a play about the recession and the black middle class. It was kismet!
What's the first thing you did when you finished writing The Final Days of Negro-Ville?

I don't think I'm finished writing The Final Days of Negro-Ville. As an artist, I'm honest enough to admit when things need work or attention or love.  The Final Days needs a few final touches.  (I hope to provide those final touches while during the Rough Reading.)  I think once I get a production of this baby, I will definitely find a real cool lounge with some amazing vocalist, like Jill Scott or Lizz Wright, singing live and I'll have somebody buy me a glass of Pinot Noir.
Rough Readings are a great opportunity.  What excites you the most about having your play performed as a staged-reading for an audience?

I love staged-reading audiences.  Actually, I love any opportunity to have a dialogue about what I find interesting or funny or important.  I think the drastic attempts of black suburbia to hold on to their financial success can be funny and interesting.  Audiences teach me amazing lessons.  They teach me when to be smarter, when I'm being too smart, when to have more fun and when to move them to feeling something deep.  And I get this from their reactions and body postures. During talk backs, great audiences will share their enthusiasms as well as their confusions.  Their confusions inspire me to be clearer.  I want to be understood.
And, just for fun, if you were able to have your "fantasy cast" for The Final Days of Negro-Ville, who would that include?

A fantasy cast? Mmm... Are you talking a cast from theater or film?  Mmm...How about I just name two of my favorite actors?  Don Cheadle and Viola Davis.  If we snag those two for a future production, I will be one happy dramatist.
To learn more about Keith's play or for ticket information, please visit http://www.playwrightsfoundation.org/index.php?p=53

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Making Space for New Plays with Michael Mitnick


After a rousing start to our Rough Reading Series in 2012 with Claire Chafee’s powerful Full/Self in January, we look ahead to the next play and playwright in our series. Michael Mitnick’s Spacebar: a Broadway Play by Kyle Sugarman.

Michael’s play, reading February 27th at Stanford and 28th in SF, is a wildly unpredictable, no-holds-barred play-within-a-play about a precocious teenager out to make his Broadway debut as a playwright against all odds. We recently sat down with Michael to ask him about his play, his road to playwriting, and the scores he has to settle with the American Theatre scene.



--------------------

To start off, Michael, what brought you to playwriting?

Like so many… I started by acting in school plays. I began to compose too (based on forced piano lessons) which resulted in some truly awful musicals I put on with my friends. It was fun, though, and from those experiences I started writing dialogue, notating music, and experimenting with plot and character.

I did my undergrad at Harvard and throughout college I wrote comic sketches and musicals, which were put on by the Hasty Pudding and The Lampoon – a place designed to turn nice students into angry alcoholics.

My lowest grade at Harvard was in Advanced Playwriting, and that really encouraged me to keep going.

After graduation I toyed with the idea of writing TV and did the BMI musical workshop. I saw the Yale Drama deadline was approaching, so I applied, submitting a play with very large margins that will never see the light of day – it took place in a barbershop and audience members were to be brought up onstage and given haircuts while the story played out.

What was the initial inspiration for your new play Spacebar: a Broadway Play by Kyle Sugarman?

The play began as a prompt from the head of Yale playwriting program, Paula Vogel. I was assigned to respond to Love’s Labour’s Lost. I couldn’t think of anything, so I looked in a folder I keep on my computer labeled “Ideas” and found a one-liner I wrote lord knows when – “Spacebar – a play not about the space key on the computer keyboard but about a bar in outer space.” Obviously I was incredibly desperate so I used that joke for the play-within-the-play.

The first draft’s structure was one big cover letter to the entity of Broadway and we got to see almost the entire play-within-the-play, with Kyle’s commentary throughout of why it was the best play ever written. Quickly I found I was much more interested in Kyle’s life – in that very teenage desire to be taken seriously, to be heard, and to settle scores. So, the scenes from his real life were written and then expanded while Kyle’s play scenes were drastically reduced. Then, the second act took shape as a kind of melding of his inner and outer worlds.

The character of Kyle in Spacebar has a lot of pointed things to say about the state of American theatre. What do you think of the current landscape?

I read amazing plays by friends and go to lots of readings and yet these plays will never be produced. It’s maddening. I wish theatres would take more chances with brave new plays. Too many plays feel like mouthpieces for regurgitating New York Times above-the-fold articles. This isn’t to say that timely plays are a bad thing, but I find that a good story is always timely. Through the specificity of the writing, the universal is achieved. Six Degrees of Separation is a masterpiece that feels immediate and relevant every time I read it yet John Guare didn’t sit down to write about race or class or art. He sat down and wrote a story. Or maybe he wrote it standing up.

Next, theatre tickets must cost the same as a movie ticket. Some theatres have good initiatives going and I wish more would join. A few years back I heard Gregory Mosher speak about this issue and it was eye opening. If you’re going to a play and bringing a date, it isn’t a turn on to say, “Hey, let’s go stand in the TKTS line for 40 minutes, buy 65 dollar ‘discounted’ tickets and then sit quietly facing the same direction for 2 hours.” The price of the ticket has to be two digits to the left of the decimal and the first digit needs to be a 1 or a 2. Theatres need to start at the ticket price and figure everything else out from there.

Would you suggest aspiring playwrights attend a graduate program?

I think Playwriting MFAs are only valuable if the particular program offers full or nearly full financial support. There is no reason to go into debt in playwriting grad programs. Tuition money is better spent supporting the practical beginning of a writing career. Move to a theatre town, work in a lit office, join a writer’s group, and write a ton.

Yale itself was good because they had generous scholarships. I had wonderful teachers who gave me feedback that made me a better writer. I could also put on my plays within the school. The place was a combination of an extended fellowship and a mini-theatre company. Most importantly, I graduated with a short stack of scripts which I could show people when I reentered humanity. 

You can’t be taught to write a play, but you can be guided and made aware of things you’re doing unconsciously. We can’t control luck or talent, but we can control ambition. The most important thing for a playwright is simply to write a lot and read a lot. Long term, your writing will get better while other aspiring people will give up, creating more opportunities for you.

And lastly, Michael, is there a scene or moment from Spacebar you are really excited to get before a live audience?

I can’t say there’s a single moment, but I’m thrilled that The Playwrights Foundation is supporting my play and the fact that audiences will show up and see something I wrote absolutely floors me. I never get over that feeling. Hopefully I’ve written something that’s worth their time.

---------------------------

For more information on Michael or his play Spacebar: a Broadway Play by Kyle Sugarman or to get ticket information please Click Here

Monday, December 12, 2011

Tiny Little Bad Boys: One-Minute Musings by Chris Chen


Some thoughts I had while writing my tiny little bad boys for the SF One-Minute Play Festival…

Here is perhaps our most famous short play, in its entirety: Beckett’s Breath:

CURTAIN :
1. Faint light on stage littered with miscellaneous rubbish. Hold about five seconds. 2. Faint brief cry and immediately inspiration and slow increase of light together reaching maximum together in about ten seconds. Silence and hold about five seconds. 3. Expiration and slow decrease of light together reaching minimum together (light as in 1) in about ten seconds and immediately cry as before. Silence and hold about 5 seconds.

And so in the end, Beckett’s views on life can be boiled down to one simple, yet endlessly huge idea (at least in my take on the piece): You’re born, you breathe in the garbage of life, you’re snuffed out. This is arguably a central notion running through Beckett’s entire oeuvre, and in a career marked by endlessly stripping down word counts to their barest essentials (he started as a novelist), he finally managed to strip away words and run-times all together.

Yet in less than a minute (around 35 seconds to be exact) he conveys volumes, and the visceral impact of making me feel as though I am breathing in garbage has a lasting effect. I can feel the toxicity, and in less than a minute a window begins to open on all the unhealthy aspects of my life. I begin to see things in terms of pollution: my bad eating habits pollute my body; my neuroses pollute my soul; my endless hours on the internet pollute my mind. Although Beckett probably didn’t intend his plays to be motivational allegories, these sudden revelations are cathartic. Because in this particular play, run-time is part of the thematic conceit: from a cosmic perspective, a single person’s life-span registers as less than a minute, so we’d be well advised not to fill our few precious seconds on earth with poison. It is a terrifying call to action.

If the goal of the playwright is to capture some essence of life, some essential Truth- with a capital T- then surely the nature of this Truth is timeless. And if this is the case, then the play, given its finite run time, can be seen as a symbolic representation, a tip of the iceberg of the endlessly expansive and endlessly expanding aspects of this Truth. So the experience of a profound play doesn’t stop when the lights come up, or even begin when the lights first go down. The experience of the play has already commenced from the time each audience member began experiencing life: accumulating their histories, forging their mind-frames, and developing their methods of processing. The audience provides the substance and meaning that fill out the symbolic actions that play out before them. And after the audience is moved and shaped by the mingling of their and the artists’ perspectives, they will carry this experience with them as they move on with their lives- from the discussion in the car ride home to the memories in their subconscious for years and decades and even generations to come. So in the end, the play is part of a continuum. It is not an isolated event.

Looking at a play from this perspective, what is the difference between a run-time of one-minute and a run-time of a hundred and twenty minutes? Relative to the span our Lives- with a capital L- there is no difference. Consider a Rembrandt painting, which is a frozen moment in time but captures multitudes that expand in time on all sides, from the history of the painted figure on one side to the emotion you carry forth into the future on the other. You may look at the painting for five seconds and tap into the timelessness that is its lineage, or it may take you half an hour to get there. Or maybe it takes exactly one minute. So I am a fan of one minute plays. Or the idea of any work of art that questions the normal boxes of time we put things in. Because the Essence- with a capital E- of what we are circling around as artists is so much bigger than any box can hold.

-Chris Chen

The Second Annual SF One-Minute Play Festival, in partnership with Playwrights Foundation at Thick House is Sat Dec 17th at 8 PM, and Sun Dec 18th at 2PM and 7PM. 60 Plays. 30+ Playwrights. 20+ Actors. 1 Minute. Tickets are $18 dollars online and available here.