Elizabeth Hersh |
Natasha Brown: Thank you for letting me
interview you. First question, is your style distinct or does it change
depending on the play?
Elizabeth Hersh: I hope my style changes
depending on the play. This play is very sparse; the characters don’t talk a
lot. This style is very specific to this play, not necessarily my writing. However,
I do write stuff that’s dark, gruesome and, hopefully, funny. I guess I do have
some consistent styles, but the way the characters interact, the way the scenes
progress and the structure come from the specific story I’m trying to tell.
NB: Are there any interesting
stories about how your play came into being?
EH: There is a character in the play
who appeared because I ran into them at my girlfriend’s parents’ house in Northern
California. They had a cleaner who brought her adult daughter along to help
out. She wore this crucifixion t-shirt and made my girlfriend’s mom hide all of
her Buddha ornaments because they made her feel uncomfortable. She would yell
at her daughter whilst we were all eating at the table and it was just this
incredibly awkward and tense situation. It made me think about the tension
between the service industry and the employer; “I am paying you to clean up
after me.” It’s such a weird interaction. She inspired the Cleaning Lady in my
play.
NB: That is both hilarious and
absurd. I’m curious about the face blindness concept in the play. Did your play
start with the concept or did it come in as you were working on it? How much do
you want the audience to be conscious of this?
EH: I didn’t even know it was in the
play until my girlfriend, who works as a director,
dramaturg and new play developer, was talking to me about it.
Sometimes, people come up and talk to me and I don’t know if I know them.
I recognize people I’m close to very well, but if I meet someone a couple of
times and then see them out of context, for example seeing someone from work
outside of work, then I find it difficult to place them. This leads to a lot of
people thinking I’m rude or that I don’t care about them. It’s not so much of a
big deal now that I can explain it to people.
My director
is legally blind and we share the same experience of the unease that comes from
thinking you know someone but not really being sure. That’s a feeling I want to
create in the play - this unease at who these people really are.
NB: After reading your play, I
wasn’t surprised to find out that you are a sound designer. Sound is such a
presence throughout the play, from the vacuum interrupting the conversation very early on to the blackouts being filled with
sound. How does sound link to the privacy issues in the play?
EH: When I was writing the play, I
felt that sound was a threat to the family. It’s part of the invasion of their
space. It’s something that they can’t control, it’s all around them, and it’s
dangerous. I try to write really openly for directors and not pre-design the
show. As a designer, I like when directors allow designers to play and
collaborate. I try not to get too attached to the ideas I have for the sound as
a writer.
NB: Yeah, I can imagine that may be
quite difficult sometimes. What do you want the audience to experience whilst
watching your play?
EH: Fundamentally, I want it to be
entertaining. This show in particular is created to grab the audience by their
stomach and pull them through the whole thing. I want them to be laughing until
horrified and then laughing some more. I want for the audience to come out and
think “What the hell just happened?” I think essentially this play is looking
at intimacy - what we think we know about people, why we isolate ourselves and
what it means to really know someone. I’ve only ever had a couple of informal
readings for this play so I’m really excited to see how a live audience reacts
to it.
NB: I’m excited too! Last question,
whose work would you recommend for emerging writers to study?
EH: Phillip Ridley – he’s brutal.
Caryl Churchill. All of the wonderful female playwrights I’ve ever read. I’m
sick of all the cis
hetero monogamous dead white men playwrights. Emerging writers should also read a
lot of fiction and go and see dance and burlesque. See performance art; see
things that are pushing boundaries, new things. We don’t need to see old plays season
after season anymore. Theatre’s job is to push the aesthetic of our culture
farther from the centre. As women playwrights, we should seek out support and
read as many plays written by other women as possible. Also, read things that
stretch outside of racial lines. Suzan-Lori Parks! I taught Topdog/Underdog at San Quentin Prison.
It was super intense. The prisoners were racially and educationally diverse.
One of them had a PhD, and some earned their college degrees whilst in
prison. It broke my preconceived notions
about how our society functions. As young playwrights, we need to be the people
putting art out there that allows us to see our privileges.
NB: Thanks, Elizabeth!
The Bay Area Playwrights Festival gives voice to emerging and established playwrights who are pushing boundaries and have the potential to shape the future of American theater and culture. The festival runs from July 18-27. Click here for the calendar and special event details for the whole festival. Shelter in Place is showing on July 18th, 8pm and July 27th, 12pm. Get your tickets here!
No comments:
Post a Comment